Axis. Bold as Love. Stereo 198029892819 and Mono 198029892918 Ultra High Quality Records. Released under license from Experience Hendrix. Limited editions.
A return to the title that kick started the Analogue Productions [AP] series of Ultra High Quality Records [UHQR]. These pair of mixes, both stereo and mono first appeared in 2019 cut at the standard speed of 331/3. While these latest pressings are again issued with the same numbers, 0001 and 0002, they display a bound morpheme, the speed of 45rpm.
As per all of the UHQR line, these are limited numbered copies. Stereo is set at 4500 and mono max's out at 2500. The set release date of the Friday 6th February 2026 was jumped somewhat and orders began being processed for shipping on the 3rd.
A title originally released November 24, 1967, the title remains as popular today demonstrating the draw of the Jimi Hendrix Experience and how there is a market for these reissues alongside of new official material.
While we do get genuinely innovative releases from Experience Hendrix, their tendency to be more reliant upon re-branding, re-packaging and occasional tweaking of material for re-issue is all too readily the norm for the company. There are those who feel this pair of releases are simply that, a money making re-issue. I'd disagree on that point, if only on the basis that this title along with Are You Experienced, Electric Ladyland and Band of Gypsys should always be to the fore of the catalogue and always be available. While I'd go further and say, the UHQR treatment arguably offers these titles the best platform for this record to be heard. For me, my disappointment is the fact that both Ladyland and the Gypsys have yet to be given this treatment. You could argue the case for the Are You Experienced mono, that being the original long playing record released by the Jimi Hendrix Experience in the UK, May 12, 1967.
Of course, the AP line of the UHQR only began in 2018/19 so it wouldn't do with a top heavy Hendrix theme. Though the excellent series has so far produced seven Steely Dan titles [all at 45rpm] and currently expanding the Bob Marley series from four to a total of 10 [five titles presented in both 33 and 45 rpm]. It's currently a healthy market for the more upmarket reissue's, one that should be taken advantage of. While noting a healthy sales market,there are a number of Hendrix recordings and filmed concerts that could be taking advantage of that bigger sales platform.
This is a title that has meant a lot to me over the years. I know it is so well loved and revered by so many I took time to garner a few comments from some of the more active fans of Jimi and the band. While I do enjoy the short sound-bite comments from the "stars", those who made it in the business and found influence etc. through Jimi's music, a lot of that felt little more than promotion of a product. For me it is all about how the man or woman on the street find this album. I've included some fan comments [credited] into the following review. These mean more somehow, without any disrespect toward anyone else, these comments feel more real, very visceral.
For me, well as a mono household up to September 8, 1973, all of my music listening would have been exclusively mono, with some exceptions albeit outside of my home. One such exception and the early introduction to stereo would be the visits to Rushworth and Dreaper1 in the city center here in Liverpool. As with all of us younger generation in the 60's, as easily and quickly that stereo drew us in we were equally as quick to dismiss mono in an all too similar fashion.
It would be many years before I returned to the mono mix of this album and realized, even when shortcut, this mix had more positives than it had been given credit, resulting in my preference for that mono mix over that of the stereo(s). Expressing that as a preference has led to some disgruntled and disparaging comments on various forums, it seems some feel it's sin to have a preference that does not align with their own!
Over a period of a decade or so, I played around with set ups, looking for the best option for mono playback, a lot of that thinking stemmed from that Classic Record mono reissue of ABAL. Indeed I had hoped to find that the route back to mono fuss free and without expense. That would not be the case, the reality is, for mono playback you require the correct equipment, with that correct equipment being a true mono cartridge. You can shortcut to mono with ease but that playback is very much compromised. Maybe that compromise is not heard until it's removed and removed fully2. While there are fairly priced options with true mono cartridges, to avoid the hassle of swapping over from stereo to mono listening there comes the outlay for a second deck or arm board instillation on the deck in use. While off putting for some and clearly not an option for others, the benefits are certainly rewarding.
All said and done, Axis. Bold as Love is no ordinary record, like a select few across the years, here we have an album of grouped songs that are idealized for stereo playback and I have to say, I love that stereo playback, I love the album, irrespective of mix.
Over many years I had been drawn to Are You Experienced and later Electric Ladyland as my personal favorite Hendrix studio release. As a youth and early adulthood, Axis was never my favorite Experience album. Initially preferring the more hard edge pop of AYE and then the spacey blues of Ladyland. With age comes a little wisdom and so it was I realized just how good the the jazzy pop based Axis is, so it is that, for a good while now, Axis. Bold as Love has been the album for me, my Hendrix drop in album with one copy or another never far from the turntable. From the original line up and aligning with the period that had the band at their peak, both individually and as that unit of the Jimi Hendrix Experience. Chas Chandler should be afforded the credit for this unity and also shaping and directing Hendrix's creative output. Couple that with Mike Jeffery's business prowess and his forging of openings and contacts for the band and the unit of "team Hendrix" was a formidable one by late 1967. Conquering both the charts and the live circuit before the band took on America in earnest.
Mikkel Bach-Rasmussen: "Axis is the album I always end up picking out for play. It's my favorite Hendrix record. From start to finish, this album takes you away on a journey of raw power and gentle love."
Jim Hawthorn: "It [Axis. Bold as Love] means the world to me. Such a beautifully crafted album which instantly expanded Jimi's musical and lyrical universe."
Frank Moriarty: “Axis: Bold as Love: the album that captures the epitome of the Jimi Hendrix Experience as a band.
On Are You Experienced the foundation was still under construction, and by Electric Ladyland the studio itself had become the dominant instrument of the already-splintering group. Axis, however, presents a road-tested band, yet one still flush with the excitement of discovering their potential. By now Jimi, Noel, and Mitch knew their strengths and set about framing them in the most powerful way on this second album.
The most obvious characteristic of Axis is the full force of the band: the heavy crush of “Spanish Castle Magic,” the irresistible surge of “You Got Me Floatin’,” the bump and grind of “Little Miss Lover.” And don’t forget “She’s So Fine,” a trifle of a song that packs the full punch of The Who’s toughest material, Mitch Mitchell giving Keith Moon a run for his money in the realm of manic percussion.
But Mitchell’s approach on “Up from the Skies” – a greasy shuffle lifted straight from the organ-jazz movement of cats like Jimmy Smith, Shirley Scott, Dr. Lonnie Smith, and Jimmy McGriff – reveals another secret weapon of Axis: twists and turns that add potent spice throughout the album. The unexpected demise of the narrator in “Wait Until Tomorrow,” the wistfully beautiful yearning of “Little Wing,” the rising tide of “One Rainy Wish.” And in a pop music world often characterized by contrived happy endings, “Castles Made of Sand” offers up three tragedies in three minutes, a dramatic mood shift that emerged from the ascension of Jimi’s lyrical talents.
The album’s climax, “Bold as Love,” is solidly built on the imaginative visions Jimi shares, providing colors with vivid personalities – or is it the other way around? Soon focus shifts entirely to the magnificent instrumental passage that seems to find its conclusion – just before a sonic reincarnation leads to one more journey that does not end, the sounds simply fading over the horizon.
Each listen to Axis: Bold as Love becomes a remarkable encounter, vibrant and revealing, eternally exciting and enveloping.
You cannot ask more of a collection of music.”
David Summers: "I don't think Jimi ever produced a more concise distillation of his genius than Axis. Bold as Love. Maybe it doesn't have quite the visceral passion of his greatest concert performances or the relentless improvisation and experimentation of some of his later studio recordings, but for me, Axis is a near perfect encapsulation of the sheer range of his artistry. It is my go to album if I want to sit back, relax for 40 minutes and remind myself once again why I fell in love with Jimi and his music more than fifty years ago."
Larry Yelen: "Upon release, my recollection is that while I liked it immediately, I recognised what I would characterize as a mellowing of a number of the compositions while continuing to develop his overall “sound.” Whereas Are You Experienced certainly mixed songs like “The wind cries Mary” and “Hey Joe” with extremely aggressive rock, blues and psychedelia, Axis wasn’t as “wild” nor nearly as transformative a musical statement as AYE and will forever feel to me like the perfect middle album by the original Experience line-up bridging AYE and Electric Ladyland."
Kees de Lange: I got hooked on Jimi on September 18, 1970. For my 17th birthday anniversary the next year, I asked for RUX and ABAL as presents. They had just appeared as cheap Dutch re-pressings. I liked RUX the most. For ABAL, I remember well the order in which I got warmed up. I immediately fell for Little Wing and Up From The Skies. For the latter, I could recite the lyrics from memory quite quickly. I especially liked Mitch's bass drum pattern at the end.
The next songs were Bold As Love, Spanish Castle Magic, Little Miss Lover, and You Got Me Floating. It didn't take me very long to appreciate the album as a whole, especially as a stereo record. RUX was only available in fake stereo, with the high end on the left and the bottom end on the right, for many years on Polydor. Mono was off the market at the time."
Jeff Dorman: I received Axis in 1968. I was in Oahu, Hawaii, where my father was stationed in the Air Force. I was 12 years old and had recently picked up the first album at the base exchange. I had first heard “Purple Haze” and “Fire” on KPOI Underground Radio, late-night on the weekends, and those tracks, coupled with the wild and colourful LP cover, had moved it to the top of my must-have LP list. It was a real prize.
Then came Axis, and it was a beautiful departure from the first LP. The fold-open cover and image of Jimi was a revelation and very entertaining. “Little Wing”, “Castles Made of Sand”, and “One Rainy Wish” were so different from anything (except “The Wind Cried Mary”) on the first LP. And the title track closer was a perfect mix of Jimi’s beautiful, poetic lyrics and his intense guitar mastery.
The album remains, to this day, my ‘desert island pick’ LP. And if there were only one song that I could ever listen to for eternity, it would be the title track, “Bold As Love”.
My parents gave me Electric Ladyland (and The Beatles' White Album) that Christmas, a couple of months after their release. It was the next chapter in Jimi’s evolution, with “1983... (A Merman I Should Turn to Be)" providing me the most poetic (and political, I soon would come to understand ) moment.
To this day, Axis stands as Jimi’s most beautiful and revealing statement. And the one album that has meant the most to me over the years."
Bob Elliott: "What can I say. Axis was the 4th LP that I ever bought. The first was Are You Experienced followed by Sgt. Peppers and Disraeli Gears. Not a bad way to start a record collection for a 12 year old :-) Axis is a great record and a great recording. I still get the same thrill listening to it today as I did when I first heard it almost 60 years ago."
Ken Voss: "To fully comprehend the sonic integrity of Axis it was essential for me to listen to it on headphones to fully immerse myself into Jimi's music and production techniques."
Jeff Mason: "Regarding Axis, I did not have the benefit of hearing it when it was brand new. After hearing some of those transcription discs of full BBC broadcasts, I'm sure if I'd been around in late '67, I'd have been blown away by how different it was from some of the more "typical" pop music out at the time. Having come to it many years after the original release, I've recently come to appreciate its genius more thanks in particular to the Atmos mix. To me, it's all about growth and experimentation. The first album, which is incredible to me, sounds more like a collection of awesome singles at time, especially when it comes to the "hits" [Note. Jeff references the US iteration of AYE]. The song Are You Experienced, one of the last recordings made for that album, points the way to where Jimi was headed in terms of creativity in the studio. That song, along with "Third Stone..." were the more experimental tunes for me. The lone "delicate" track was "The Wind Cries Mary".
With Axis, Jimi was settled into his new lifestyle in England and had a specific block of time booked at a single studio with which to work. The overall LP has a more consistent sound signature throughout as a result. For me, it was a larger canvas on which Jimi was allowed to create, and I feel the individual songs on the album sound less piecemeal in design and more "cut from the same cloth" in relation to each other. Having Kramer there from day one probably helped with that and Chas' knack for getting tight, concise recordings of the band without doing endless takes was likely an essential component.
What we get is a beautiful woven tapestry of sound. Experimentation and science fiction (Exp - Up From The Skies) are masterfully juxtaposed next to the heaviness of Spanish Castle Magic and the dreaminess of "Little Wing" and "One Rainy Wish". To me, it's the sound of an artist who was finally able to be creative without some of the earlier constraints necessitated by time and money. To me, more than the other LP's released in his lifetime, it's a coherent sonic vision/story. The other 2 LP's may have higher highs, but Axis takes you on a journey full of emotional peaks and valleys, and you come out the other side in awe.
The Experience themselves were perhaps at their tightest in the studio. Total frustration had not yet set in as it would during the making of EL. It's the sound of a band still on their way up, firing on all cylinders, before the relentless touring, partying and hangers on had fully gotten their claws into their everyday and creative lives. To me, Axis sounds lighter, tighter; full of energy and optimism as a result, while still showing they could rock hard (SCM in particular) if they wanted to."
Steve Elphick: "Sometimes this album is what I consider to be Jimi’s finest release, coming hard on the heels of AYE which is often seen as one of the finest debut albums of all time. A real diverse collection of very different styles of music, and one in which I consider Jimi further honed his songwriting skills - from the jazzy, bouncing, ‘Up From The Skies’, the pounding and mysterious ‘If 6 Was 9’, to the sublimely beautiful ‘Little Wing’.
Jimi’s wonderful development as an excellent lyricist is also evident on this album particularly on Castles Made Of Sand. - the line “…surprise attack killed him in his sleep that night”, is a fabulous (and funny to me) twist within the song.
Also Eddie Kramer’s production skills were truly allowed so much more freedom on Axis. For its time, nearly 60 years ago, with fairly limited equipment he created what I consider to be a very powerful sound….including great use of echo and reverb, masses of channel panning and phasing."
Ken Sinyard: "Axis Bold as Love was the first album I bought of Jimi, from my Saturday job wages in the first week it came out, having heard 'Purple Haze' a month or so earlier, (which he worked on down in Folkestone, as it was much longer, or so I am told, at the same time as Fire' at Noel's mothers house).
I played it on my 'Stereo', which was a record player with a separate speaker.
Little did I know I would play this album, to destruction...... or at least every night when doing my homework, along with Led zeppelin 1, and Creams Wheels of Fire, throughout my early years, stacking the 3 LP's, which of course wrecked them! Only when Electric Ladyland came along, did it have only a weekly outing. For me, Axis sits second only to Jimi's masterpiece, Electric Ladyland"
While not every Hendrix fan comes to Axis with the same mind set.
Olaf Kockmeyer: “To me AYE was always more of a favourite to me than Axis, because I think it is a bit rougher and less polished than ABAL, and it has not so many favourite songs for me than AYE. But: the cool and jazzy Up From The Skies, the indescribable beauty of Little Wing, the finesse of CMOS and Bold As Love (incl. the outtake from the velvet box set) with it's great dramatic guitar work stand out for me. When I hear the Bold As Love outtake in my car (loud), I always hear it a second time again. To be honest I never really liked She's So Fine and You Got Me Floating or Little Miss Lover. I don't think it is a coincidence that only 2 songs made it into his live set list (LW and SCM). I hope this is not sounding too negative; it is a fantastic album. And I never really understood the India-related sleeve art, but: the French and the Japanese ABAL first issue sleeve art is to me among, let's say, the top five cover art works of Hendrix sleeves.
Johan Van Wieren: "My initial exposure was through the adverts for Cornerstones. That led to Cry of Love. I Got ELL, AYE and Monterey before i ever was exposed to ABAL.
To be totally honest when I then got ABAL i didn’t 'vibe' with it as much as any of the ones mentioned before, hard for me to give a clear reason for that now but that’s how it was. Later on when the tape trading days (and UV/JP) started for me my curiosity was mainly the Live audience material, no matter the sound quality they were gems to me
Now this year I’ll be 50 and appreciate ABAL and can somewhat see it in the timeline of Jimi's career, it still is my least favorite original album."
Could Hendrix have achieved quite what this album represents with any other pair of musicians other than Noel and Mitch? I have a strong hunch he wouldn't.
The album itself, made in Britain by a transatlantic trio with the support and input of a South African and a couple of English blokes. Yet fully immersed in the musical roots of American blues and Jimi's own lifetime experiences. While it remains impossible to understand the lack of live performance of material from this album, there is a degree of studio trickery in the making of Axis, that may well have influenced that call. The introduction of flanging and backward guitar, the latter never quite presented better than how it appears on both the UHQR stereo and mono pressings.
With Little Wing and Spanish Castle Magic being the only two tracks to become staples to a live set. While Little Miss Lover also made an outing at the Maple Leaf gig in Canada [as part of a medley] captured on tape, there are numerous fan reports of this song being part of a number of shows. Oddly, the recent Bold as Love box set omitted the BBC "live" recording from its running order. An odd call given the nature of that set. An even rarer to live performance would be Bold as Love. With just the single capture and no supported claims for any other gig, we have the single capture of the title track from The Scene Club, late February 1968.
This album is very much a heart on the sleeve collection of songs, some of that intimacy is dissolved through the stereo presentation, for me at least. Keep in mind, these comments are presented prior to listening to either of the 45rpm pressings. The raw and full power of Hendrix the song writer, the musician is more accessible in the mono mix. Presented in mono we get behind the all too upfront smoke screen of the moving image and the album is delivered in a far more powerful manner once that illusion is removed. Clearly, the album is created with the help of and heavily influenced through, the recreational drugs of the time. With the listener seemingly being encouraged to embrace that same state of conscience for stereo playback. All fits nicely with that illusion that stereo has to offer.
Despite claims to the contrary, this album was not "rush released" in the UK. There was always a dead line being worked to and the Christmas market was a planned aim, at least from Polydor's perspective. That Jimi claims to have lost part of the recording in a taxi is more than questionable, see https://jmhvinyl.co.uk/articles-and-comment for the questioning of that claim and oft repeated and a various array of takes of the story. If anything was rushed that would be the final mix of the whole album [not a single side as would be expected if only one reel was lost]. That other stereo mix, the first one undertaken by Hendrix, Chandler and Kramer appears to have been utilized by Polydor Records. Track Records and Warner / Reprise would use the remixed stereo and the Polydor group would use the initial stereo mix globally with exception to North America.
It's sad that there is a lack of recognition for that initial stereo mix, a point that seems to be side stepped far too often. More of a concern is an understanding as to if Experience Hendrix have yet to acquire that master mix tape. The lack of comment may suggest not, though the lack of comment may be for a consideration otherwise. In a world of ownership, license and litigation it may well be that it is too problematic to bother with any consideration of or for this alternate stereo mix.
That initial stereo mix is stated as being undertaken on October 31, 1967. The following night, 1st November the second stereo mix was undertaken. With Thursday November 2nd, 1967 seeing Hendrix, Chandler and Kramer convened at Olympic to "craft discrete mono mixes of the entire album".
For some, it seems the wait from announcement of these 45rpm UHQR's to actual release date, a little over 20 weeks, was somewhat too long. That wait seems to have impacted pre-orders with a few folk claiming to have canceled their order during that period. Was that the best call?
During that period of announcement to release we got some blurb in terms of what was to come. I'm not sure as to why somebody with an understanding of proceedings didn't at least give the claims a little bit more time and attention.
Experience Hendrix:
“Experience Hendrix in association with Legacy Recordings, Analogue Productions and Quality Record Pressings is set to release Axis: Bold As Love as a limited edition, UHQR, definitive 45 RPM Stereo and Mono edition. Both versions have been recently remixed and cut by noted mastering engineer Bernie Grundman from the original analog master tapes.
Stepping over to the AP site, we get this as their opening comments:
Double LP cut at 45 RPM
The pinnacle of high-quality vinyl — the Ultra High Quality Record (UHQR™)
Definitive handmade limited run reissue of Jimi Hendrix Axis: Bold As Love
Newly remastered by Bernie Grundman from the original master tapes
Stereo release limited to 4,500 copies
Pressed at Quality Record Pressings using Clarity Vinyl®
Purest possible pressing and most visually stunning presentation and packaging!
Includes 16-page booklet with recording session info and an essay written by Brad Tolinski, former editor of Guitar World Magazine
Given Experience Hendrix predisposition of presenting either inadequate or inaccurate information, either pre or with their releases, it's likely that the remixed claim is once again from an over enthusiastic promotions person within Sony or Experience Hendrix but that does not excuse the lack of proof reading. While these inaccuracies do not help with those who may be less informed.
Both mono and stereo mixes have been serious contenders for the 45rpm treatment since the Ultra High Quality Record release of the 33rpm's in 2019, they do feel like a long time coming, more so for some.
I do have a number of pressings from across the globe to compare against for both mixes. I took time out before release to whittle down these pressings to a more manageable number, and yet on listen to the 45rpm's I felt that was unnecessary, for the most part.
If you can't get past "vintage sound", these are not for you nor are any of the other reissues, though you will be missing something special with the mastering, notably with the stereo cut. Outside of these UHQR's, the only other place to find Grundman's mastering is through the Bold as Love vinyl box set. That should and does give a great insight into the mastering found here on the 45rpm and that of the earlier 33rpm UHQR.
Presentation: The boxes are the new model design, not to my taste. Not that I have issue with changing the housing for these UHQR's, rather the type now incorporated. Bland and standard, even if one didn't like the previous design, it did make a statement and was far more functional.
The boxes contain the usual inserts, a pamphlet presenting technical specifications plus the certificates, statement and the Quality Record Pressing Team. We also have the all important booklet. Information wise, essay wise it replicates the booklet from the earlier UHQR's from 2019, though here we have an extra 10 shots included, all from live performance settings except the familiar Monterey shot of Jimi in the crowd. It would have been far more appropriate and informing had there been studio shots included rather than simply dropping in what feels like random live pictures.
While very nicely laid out and presented, as per usual for Experience Hendrix, it lacks detailed information. Even the photographs don't carry the venue and or date, seemingly it is more important to display ownership and license along with the photographers name. While I have no problem locating and dating all of the photographs, that may not be the case for everyone who buys this product.
Clarity Vinyl: While there are complaints regard to the vinyl formula, Clarity vinyl has as yet not presented me with such issues as has been reported by a few. Bar non-fill issue and one instance of distortion my Clarity pressings have played out very well. There is one point to highlight [again], these issued 45rpm ABAL's appear on slightly tweaked clarity vinyl than that of the first UHQR's, a minor tweak to the formula. The idea behind this "special" vinyl formula is to present a "blacker" back ground. From spinning the mono 45rpm I can say this played absolutely perfectly and demonstrates the improvement over the standard vinyl in use at QRP.
Weight and Speed [45RPM]: Weight is as arguable as to any benefit return as the rest of the differences involved with pressing records. For me it is often the least of interest, especially as most plants output is set for 180 gram, unless contacts dictates otherwise. Used as a promotional point, 200 gram [or even 180gram] is a weight not often attained, though the UHQR's at 200 gram are specified as the minimum weight.
Speed, well I find this unarguable, it makes a considerable difference to my ears. These ABAL releases demonstrate quite clearly the difference to be had and as with most titles that have both a 33 and a 45rpm release. Generally speaking and is the case here, direct A/B'ing is not a requirement to hear that difference.
It has been argued, with this and other 45rpm cuts, that splitting a single side across two sides of vinyl is disruptive to the flow and not what the artist intended. Rather a weak argument I feel, in both instances. With these 45rpm pressings, the flow does not alter as the sequencing is not altered from the original. While to argue that this is not what the artist intended clearly is misguided somewhat. It may well be more correct to argue that this is not what was intended by the industry through its standards at the time of original release, with the artist working to the commercial boundaries set at the time.
Flat Profile: Again, there is a short overview as to what is a clear benefit from this process contained in the box of each pressing. The benefit is quite distinct, especially highlighted with the 45rpm cuts.
Both boxes carry the 2009 and 2025 dates, maybe someone can better understand this but it appears to be the licensing date for the first Sony contract and the manufacture year.
It may be a good idea to think about what you want from a record before spending on an expensive pressing or even the latest "newly remastered" outing. Outside of collecting, be that for its own sake or for the opportunity of comparison / review reason, it is often best to simply stick with what you are happy with. Then again, systems change, preference can sit elsewhere, especially when we factor in five decades and worn copies of records and we don't hang on doggedly to the idea of the romance of vintage for the sake of it. Do we simply cater for that nostalgia and hunt a great copy of our old favorite? Or do we look to get something as similar but more modern, or indeed arguably an improvement on not just the original but on everything that has gone before?
Mono Axis. Bold as Love Analogue Productions / Experience Hendrix / Sony 198029892918
Without beating about the bush, the following comments regard to the mono mix release is taken from the perspective of true mono playback. That is simply the use of the correct equipment, that of a monaural cartridge.
Being brutal, if you don't have a dedicated mono cartridge or no plans to go that route, there is little if any requirement past collecting [or flipping], to buy this mono UHQR at $150 plus shipping. This is a comment written pre hearing the UHQR 45rpm, though I don't foresee any change in that perspective any time soon. Why? Well I don't get the point of spending big to get [possibly] the best pressing of the mono mix, a pressing designed to remove as much extraneous noise as possible from a record. To then reintroduce crosstalk etc. back into playback, simply comes across as two steps forward and three back. Isn't the whole idea of clarity vinyl, flat profile, speed of cut and vinyl weight [factors that add to the cost of the product] purposed for a clear and cleaner playback? The fact remains, short-cutting to mono can never fully remove what has been introduced through the use of a stereo cartridge.
The best advise I can give on the matter, buy the easily available repress of the 2013 mono ABAL, cut by Bernie Grundman, for $15. Though I'd buy from the US [Analogue Productions], that to ensure you get what is advertised. While the likes of Denon, Audio-Technica are your friend.
What is fascinating with Axis. Bold as Love in mono is not that we do have some wonderful options, that happens with many titles being reissued, but that all of the modern options each have something to offer and all of the reissues from 2010 onward [all Bernie Grundman cut] excel and are worth owning as they each offer something of a different merit. Yet what merits they hold can only really be accessed via a true mono cartridge.
It cannot be over emphasized just how important a true mono cartridge is for mono playback, don't kid yourself otherwise. Though if paying an entry level fee for a true mono cartridge is a little bit too much the best advice I can give is to playback your mono records with a low end MM cartridge with an elliptical stylus. Just shortcut it as you would and right there is likely the best results and return within the constraint of simulated mono as you will get, regardless as to how much you invested on your system chain.
It pains to think just how many will invest in this 45rpm and will not look to get the best out of it. Would you buy the most expensive single malt and dilute it with water? Would you buy a top end sports car and feed it cheap fuel? So why buy this UHQR of a dedicated mono mix and play it back with the wrong equipment? The benefit is all to clear and obvious for correct playback.3
My take on short-cutting to mono is simple, it delivers simulated mono. Something to my mind and ears that is fake. Sure, you get to hear the differences in the mix but that's were it ends, the listening experience can only be evaluated through true mono playback. Absolute focus, that's what you get in return for investing into even an entry level true mono cartridge and that is something that cannot be replicated through any shortcut.
Stripped of the freak flag flying trippy regalia, the mono cut clearly demonstrates just how good an album this is on every level. For mono lovers and those who take that playback serious, even those who don't "do" Hendrix, this 2026 mono UHQR is a must have.
2010 saw Mike Hobson release, through Classic Records, his licensed ABAL that he had collaborated on with Bernie Grundman. While all of what was to come from Grundman presented considerable improvement, this cut presents something quite different and distinct from what was to come. Presented as some sort of quasi Track Record replica, it did indeed mirror the ambiance of that '67 pressing, yet went on to surpass it in many ways.
Anyone looking to replace that vintage '67 cut cannot go far wrong with this Classic pressing, even if it does carry a little bit of an after market premium, it is readily available and copies are usually well looked after. Against the original, this Classic pressing delivers improved resolution on that earlier record and builds on that by delivering air and space between instruments and vocal. That presents a bigger imaged return than any vintage cut of this record can get close to.
For me it's a pressing that has a place in the collection due to the uniqueness and exploring Hendrix in mono remains an essential addition. While that is something that can be achieved through shortcutting.
While the key to the success of this cut sits in it being run through a tube cutting system. To get the full benefit of that you do really need that true mono cartridge, this record is breath taking when played back correctly. There are times when this will be the only playback that satiates that mono mood as it satisfies with the vintage feel.
While it took 40 years for anyone to bother with a mono re-cut of this title, now we appear spoilt for choice, thanks to Experience Hendrix.
2013 saw the mono title cropping up again, this time under the Sony umbrella. While this would be pressed in both the US and EU from original lacquers, the latter would simply become a digitally sourced pressing for either one or both sides of the record due to Record Industries in the Netherlands requiring fresh plates and subsequently cutting from a digital file, as supplied. In 2013, sales appeared more of a novelty than a serious consideration and the inimitable draw of the stereo mix remained.
In 2015, Newbury Comics secured a license to have a short run of 2000 mono copies issued on transparent orange vinyl. It took four years for those to sell out, while at the same time [2015] QRP repressed and reissued this as a standard black vinyl copy, that remains in print. That limited Newbury pressing only sold out after the Analogue Productions UHQR mono 33 had made the title popular and had itself sold out pre issue.
The 2013 pressing sounded considerably different to anything that had come before. Tone, well here this is clearly not an all tube cut from Bernie Grundman. Yet, despite being a more polite mastering we got a fair degree more detail. It was as open and airy as the Classic but different in visual presentation. How much that extra detail was apparent didn't become clear until it was treated to the mono cartridge. Yet while subject to short-cutting playback, this 2013 could easily take more volume than the Classic could under the similar constraint of "false" mono playback. With the 2013 cut at a lower volume over all, they both have similar peak values.
It is odd, but I felt this 2013 was cut with short-cutting in mind. Though that is likely far from an accurate claim. What is beyond challenge, this sounded so much different and it took me a while to get used to it. In fact it wasn't until I heard this 2013 cut through bigger speakers and class A/B power did I start to really appreciate just what was on offer here. It remains a bargain at its current price of $15 at AP. Though, once swapping in the Cadenza mono and as with all mono records, this thing is a different animal altogether. The detail in this cut is greater than both the 2010 and the UHQR 33. That's the mastering at play, Grundman worked something differently here once free of the client request for a "more vintage sounding" mono Axis.
The 2013 highlights Mitch's cymbal work through that extra detail, they ride on a little more and have a very natural sound. This mastering does bring forward Noel's slight vocal sibilance, while noticeable on all of the mono cuts, here it sort of jumps out a little more, a little more jarring. While on that sibilance note, it is interesting to hear/ see this sibilance differently across the differing mono cuts.
Bringing the UHQR cut at 33rpm into the comparison, the 33 UHQR appears to have been cut very similar to the 2013, certainly lower than the 2000 from Classic. That UHQR indeed has lower peaks than either of the classic or 2013 on the B side. I only mention the differences I hear so as to inform that I was volume matching if required, yet it remains an important point when mono is incorrectly played back. While the highest peak values never seemed to match across these cuts.
That UHQR from 2019 did give me my mono fix when shortcut. At least from a comparative perspective it was my "go to" if you prefer, under simulated replay. Though the Cadenza mono brought me back to the more vintage sounding 2010, if for little reason other than the Classic was like comfort food. While again with correct playback of the three I felt happier with the extra detail delivered from the 2013, which also had a little more bass extension. Considering this, I always pulled the UHQR 2019 off of the shelf for listening, there is something just right with this pressing, maybe the over all balance. How that impacts could easily be the vinyl formula and the flat profile at play. This cut didn't have to try to be something, it just was. That something was what I hoped for with the 45rpm but delivered "better", more resolution at least.
So far, it was fascinating to see just how each of the modern cuts played out between the speakers. While clearly mono, they all had space and air and very much each delivered a cohesive sound that also clearly had each instrument or vocal in its place. In comparison to the real vintage pressings, this was a huge improvement. those early pressings never got close to space and air being delivered asin the more modern cuts. If real vintage is your thing then the Track Pressing from 1967 is highly recommended over any other true vintage pressing I have heard.
While the 45rpm cut has had little time on the TT it sure was noticeable as to what it delivered and differently. Think big, and I mean big .... that was the presentation. All of the bass that is so obvious in this mono mix sits across this 45rpm, controlled and deep, underpinning Jimi and Mitch's playing and decidedly in your face. You wont be able to ignore Noels part in this creation, mixed in here like you never get with the stereo.
Jimi's guitar on Castles has never sounded so good as it does when fixed and suspended between the speakers as it is here. There is just something about this mix that delivers, seemingly defying its creators intent.
Eddie Kramer mentions [see his comments in the liner notes of the Classic 2000] how drier the mono mix is, that is easily discernible on this cut, that though is not to its detriment in any way. Being mono, maybe this is a better "fit", regardless it works.
Again volume matching was required but as this is across four sides that became a little more involved. With sides A and B there appeared no difference between them, likewise sides 3 and 4 would match each other, yet there is a little difference between A/B and C/D. The latter pairing being a touch louder, though given the final side peaks as loud as I've heard across any of these mono albums that maybe accounts for the difference I hear.
I was and continue to be impressed by this 45rpm mono. Beside big, throwing a sound-stage out that was wider and deeper than any of its competitors, here we got detail in spades. Bass in spades. The separation was clearer and more defined without loss of any coherence. Usually after playing the mono mix I'm left with the feeling that Little Wing and Bold as Love are to be heard only in stereo, not here, not with this 45rpm. The album, the mix is glorious be it as a near field listen or when I'm five meters away. Forced to select just one of the mono copies to live with, this would be it. I'm just pleased to have such a great selection of Grundman mastered mono records at my disposal.
What's best from the mono's? Again and I make no apology for repeating this, if playback is simulated then there is no reason for anything past the 2013, be it the stand alone pressing or the re-cut of the 2013 that comes with the Bold as Love box set. For those going the whole hog on mono it is a little more difficult for recommendation as I feel the tube cut Classic 2000 and this 45rpm cut need be part of your listening experience, then again so do the 2013 and 2019!
The final word of course is for the 45rpm. I like it, it is very impressive and worth the extra exercise with turning sides. There is nothing to dislike about this 45rpm for me, I'm sure I'll enjoy it even more once it's had further playback.